|
Toward New Criminal Investigations into the Events
of September 11
|
(Back to Main Document
Overview) -- (Back to Index
of Appendices)
APPENDIX
3
ZOGBY INTERNATIONAL 9/11 POLL
and
NEW YORK LEGISLATOR SURVEY
- RESULTS -
(Part I: Zogby International
Poll) --- (Go to Part II: Legislator Survey)
The following is the text of a press release
by Zogby
International, Monday, August 30, 2004
Original at www.zogby.com/news/ReadNews.dbm?ID=855
Complete tabular breakdown of poll results available at
www.911truth.org/dossier/zogby911.pdf
Half of New Yorkers Believe U.S. Leaders Had
Foreknowledge of Impending 9/11 Attacks and
"Consciously Failed" To Act;
66% Call For New Probe of Unanswered Questions
by Congress or New York's Attorney General,
New Zogby International Poll Reveals
(Utica, NY) - On the eve of a Republican National Convention invoking 9/11
symbols, sound bytes and imagery, half (49.3%) of New York City residents and
41% of New York citizens overall say that some of our leaders "knew in
advance that attacks were planned on or around September 11, 2001, and that they
consciously failed to act," according to the poll conducted by Zogby
International. The poll of New York residents was conducted from Tuesday August
24 through Thursday August 26, 2004. Overall results have a margin of sampling
error of +/-3.5.
The poll is the first of its kind conducted in America that surveys attitudes
regarding US government complicity in the 9/11 tragedy. Despite the acute legal
and political implications of this accusation, nearly 30% of registered
Republicans and over 38% of those who described themselves as "very
conservative" supported the claim. The charge found very high support among
adults under 30 (62.8%), African-Americans (62.5%), Hispanics (60.1%), Asians
(59.4%), and "Born Again" Evangelical Christians (47.9%).
Less than two in five (36%) believe that the 9/11 Commission had
"answered all the important questions about what actually happened on
September 11th," and two in three (66%) New Yorkers (and 56.2% overall)
called for another full investigation of the "still unanswered
questions" by Congress or Elliot Spitzer, New York's Attorney General.
Self-identified "very liberal" New Yorkers supported a new inquiry by
a margin of three to one, but so did half (53%) of "very conservative"
citizens across the state. The call for a deeper probe was especially strong
from Hispanics (75.6%), African-Americans (75.3%) citizens with income from
$15-25K (74.3%), women (62%) and Evangelicals (59.9%).
W. David Kubiak, executive director of 911truth.org, the group that
commissioned the poll, expressed genuine surprise that New Yorkers' belief in
the administration's complicity is as high or higher than that seen overseas.
"We're familiar with high levels of 9/11 skepticism abroad where there has
been open debate of the evidence for US government complicity. On May 26th the
Toronto Star reported a national poll showing that 63% of Canadians are also
convinced US leaders had 'prior knowledge' of the attacks yet declined to act.
There was no US coverage of this startling poll or the facts supporting the
Canadians' conclusions, and there has been virtually no debate on the victim
families' scores of still unanswered questions. I think these numbers show that
most New Yorkers are now fed up with the silence, and that politicians trying to
exploit 9/11 do so at their peril. The 9/11 case is not closed and New York's
questions are not going away."
Nicholas Levis of NY 9/11 Truth, an advisor on the poll, agrees, "The
9/11 Commission gave us a plenty of 'recommendations', but far more plentiful
were the discrepancies, gaps and omissions in their supposedly 'final' report.
How can proposals based on such deficient findings ever make us safe? We think
these poll numbers are basically saying, 'Wait just a minute. What about the
scores of still outstanding questions? What about the unexplained collapses of
WTC 7, our air defenses, official accountability, the chain of command on 9/11,
the anthrax, insider trading & FBI field probes? There's so much more to
this story that we need to know about.' When such a huge majority of New Yorkers
want a new investigation, it will be interesting to see how quickly Attorney
General Spitzer and our legislators respond." (Contact:
nicholas@911truth.org, Tel. 917.295.4929)
SCOPE: The poll covered five areas of related interest: 1) Iraq - do New
Yorkers think that our leaders "deliberately misled" us before the war
(51.2% do); 2) the 9/11 Commission - did it answer all the "important
questions" (only 36% said yes); 3) the inexplicable and largely unreported
collapse of the third WTC skyscraper on 9/11 - what was its number (28% of NYC
area residents knew); 4) the question on complicity; and 5) how many wanted a
new 9/11 probe. All inquiries about questions, responses and demographics should
be directed to Zogby International.
SPONSOR: 911truth.org is a coalition of researchers, journalists and victim
family members working to expose and resolve the hundreds of critical questions
still swirling around 9/11, especially the nearly 400 questions that the Family
Steering Committee filed with the 9/11 Commission which they fought to create.
Initially welcomed by the commissioners as a "road map" for their
inquiry, these queries cut to the heart of 9/11 crimes and accountability.
Specifically, they raised the central issues of motive, means and cui bono (who
profited?). But the Commission ignored the majority of these questions, opting
only to explore system failures, miscommunications and incompetence. The victim
families' most incisive issues remain unaddressed to this day. The Zogby
International poll was also cosponsored by Walden Three (walden3.org) and 9/11
Citizens Watch (911citizenswatch.org), a watchdog group which has monitored the
Commission since its inception and will release its findings, "The 9/11
Omission Report," in several weeks.
On September 9th and 11th, 911Truth.org will cosponsor two large successive
inquiries in New York, a preliminary 9/11 Citizens Commission hearing and
"Confronting the Evidence: 9/11 and the Search for Truth," a
research-focused evidentiary forum. These inquiries will examine many of the
9/11 Commission-shunned questions and discuss preparation of a probable cause
complaint demanding a grand jury and criminal investigation from the New York
Attorney General. Possible charges range from criminal negligence and gross
dereliction of duty to foreknowledge, complicity and subsequent obstruction of
justice. For details and developments, see www.911truth.org. For press info,
contact Kyle Hence 212-243-7787 kylehence@earthlink.net
Zogby International conducted interviews of 808 adults chosen at random in
New York State. All calls were made from Zogby International headquarters in
Utica, N.Y., from 8/24/04 through 8/26/04. The margin of error is +/- 3.5
percentage points. Slight weights were added to region, party, age, race,
religion, and gender to more accurately reflect the population. Margins of error
are higher in sub-groups.
Ø
(Appendix 3, Part II)
SURVEY OF LEGISLATORS
REPRESENTING NEW YORK CITY
ON THEIR REACTIONS TO THE
ZOGBY "9/11 POLL" RESULTS
After the Zogby International poll surveying New Yorkers' beliefs about the
September 11 attacks, the radio program AINT THAT GOOD NEWS and the broadcaster
WBAI 99.5 FM PACIFICA RADIO conducted a mail and telephone survey of legislators
representing New York City, to find out their reactions to the Zogby poll
results.
SURVEY CONDUCTED from September 21, 2004 to October 15, 2004.
TOTAL NUMBER OF
REPRESENTATIVES CONTACTED: 131
City Council Members..... 49
State Senators.................. 23
State Assemblypersons.... 44
Congresspersons.............. 13
U.S. Senators..................... 2
TYPE OF CONTACT MADE
Representatives for the five boroughs of New York City were surveyed -
Manhattan, Brooklyn, Bronx, Queens and Staten Island. The survey sheet was faxed
following phone calls. Phone calls were made and surveys faxed specifically on
September 21, 22, 29, 30 and October 12, 13, 14, 15. Every legislator's office
was contacted by phone at least twice. A few received the survey additionally by
e-mail upon request. Senator Hillary Rodham Clinton's office informed WBAI that
they would respond another time, the Senator being too busy to respond within
the deadline. There was no response from Senator Charles Schumer's office.
Ø
RESPONDENTS: 16 REPRESENTATIVES
Members of the U.S. House of Representatives: 2
Jerrold Nadler (New York 8th District)
Edolphus Towns (New York 10th District)
Members of the New York State Senate: 3
John L. Sampson (Senate District 19, Brooklyn)
Ada L. Smith (Senate District 12, Queens)
Toby Ann Stavisky (Senate District 16, Flushing/Queens)
Members of the New York State Assembly: 5
Carl E. Heastie (Assembly District 83, Bronx)
Ivan Lafayette (Assembly District 34, Jackson Heights/Queens)
Nick Perry (Assembly District 58, Brooklyn)
Annette Mitchell Robinson (Assembly District 56, Brooklyn)
Scott Stringer (Assembly District 67, Manhattan)
Members of the New York City Council: 6
Erik Martin Dilan (NYCC District 37, Brooklyn)
C. Letitia James (NYCC District 35, Brooklyn)
Margarita Lopez (NYCC District 2, Manhattan)
C. Hiram Monserrate (NYCC District 21, Queens)
Philip Reed (NYCC District 8, Manhattan)
Assumption: James Gennaro (NYCC District 24, Queens)
(NOTE: Returned form only says "Councilman James." We are assuming
it is Mr. Gennaro because the only other James in the City Council, James
Sanders Jr., was one of 3 council members who did not receive a survey.)
Ø
SURVEY QUESTIONS
1.Before this communication had you heard of this particular Zogby poll,
released August 30, 2004? Yes No
2. What was your initial reaction to the poll? .................
3. Are you aware that of the list of 383 questions presented for
investigation by the Family Steering Committee to the government's commission,
over 1/2 remain unanswered? Yes No
4. As the people's representative in government, would you support the call
of 2/3 of NY City residents and 56% of the State's residents to reopen the 9/11
investigations? Yes No
5. Which do you think is the most effective venue today for getting to the
truth of 9/11: the Congress, or Attorney General Eliott Spitzer's office?
How would you have answered the following five questions from the Zogby
International poll of New Yorkers' attitudes to the 9/11 attacks, taken Aug.
24-26, 2004?
(Note: Original results of the Zogby poll are included here, but were not
specified on the form distributed to the legislators.)
6A. No atomic, chemical or biological weapons have been found in Iraq. Yet
many officials in our government, including the President, repeatedly told us
they were there. Do you agree or disagree that these officials deliberately
misled the public about the threat Iraq posed to America?
(Zogby poll results for a random sampling of 808 New York State residents:
Agree, 51.2%; Disagree, 42.6%; No Statement, 6.2%)
6B. The 9/11 Commission has now completed its report. Do you agree or
disagree that it answered all the important questions about what actually
happened on September 11th, 2001?
(Poll results: Agree, 36.4%; Disagree, 39.3%; NS, 24.3%)
6C. One of the issues the Commission did not address was the unexplained
collapse of a third skyscraper at the World Trade Center on the afternoon of
September 11th. What was the number of that building?
(Seven, 20.8%; Other, 10.5%; NS, 68.8%)
6D. Some have argued that some leaders in the U.S. government knew in advance
that attacks were planned on or around September 11, 2001, and that they
consciously failed to take action. Do you agree or disagree with this argument?
(Agree, 40.9%; Disagree, 48.5%; NS, 10.6%. In NYC: Agree, 49.3%; Disagree,
39.2%; NS, 11.5%)
6E. The 9/11 victims' families who lobbied to create the 9/11 Commission
filed nearly 400 questions with the Commission. The majority of the questions
were not addressed. Do you agree or disagree that either the Congress or the New
York Attorney General should re-open the 9/11 investigation to examine the still
unanswered questions?
(Agree, 56.2%; Disagree, 35.3%; NS, 8.5%. In NYC: Agree, 65.6%; Disagree,
26.5%; NS, 7.9%)
Ø
TALLY OF ALL RESULTS BY QUESTION
KEY
For all questions, DK: don't know; N/A: no answer.
For question 5, ES: Eliot Spitzer; C: Congress.
For questions 6A to 6E, A: agree; DA: do not agree.
|
Congressman
Edolphus Towns |
|
No |
X |
No |
Yes |
ES |
A |
A |
"5?" |
A |
A |
|
Congressman
Jerrold Nadler |
|
No |
"Nt Surp" |
No |
Yes |
ES/C* |
A |
DA |
DK |
DA |
A |
|
"Nt
Surp" - Not surprised
* Prefers Congress, if under Democratic control |
|
State Senator
John L. Sampson |
|
No |
"Intrstng" |
No |
Yes |
ES |
DK |
A |
DA |
DK |
A |
|
State Senator
Ada L. Smith |
|
No |
"Trbling" |
No |
Yes |
C |
A |
A |
DA |
DA |
A |
|
State Senator
Toby Ann Stavisky |
|
No |
X |
No |
Yes |
** |
A |
DA |
*** |
DK |
A |
|
** Non-partisan independent investigation
*** "Question not clear" (6C, i.e. on the number of 7WTC) |
|
Assemblyman Carl
E. Heastie |
|
No |
**** |
No |
Yes |
ES |
A |
DA |
7WTC |
A |
A |
|
**** Concern about thorough investigation being conducted |
|
Assemblyman
Ivan C. Lafayette |
|
No |
X |
No |
No |
C |
DK |
DK |
DK |
DA |
DK |
|
No |
N/A |
No |
Yes |
ES |
A |
DA |
X |
DA |
A |
|
Assemblywoman
A.M. Robinson |
|
Yes |
Shock |
Yes |
Yes |
ES |
A |
DK |
DK |
A |
A |
|
Assemblyman
Scott Stringer |
|
No |
X |
No |
Yes |
ES |
A |
A |
7WTC |
DK |
A |
|
Councilman
Erik Martin Dilan |
|
No |
X |
No |
Yes |
C |
A |
DA |
7WTC |
DA |
A |
|
Councilwoman
C. Letitia James |
|
No |
Pos.# |
No |
Yes |
C |
A |
DA |
DK |
DK |
A***** |
|
# Positive reaction to poll, "now that I know"
***** Strong preference for Congress |
|
Councilwoman
Margarita Lopez |
|
No |
****** |
No |
Yes |
ES |
A |
DA |
7WTC |
DA |
A |
|
****** " Fantastic,"
i.e. Zogby poll was a good idea |
|
Councilman C.
Hiram Monserrate |
|
Yes |
Good |
No |
Yes |
ES |
A |
DA |
DK |
DA |
A |
|
Councilmember
Philip Reed ## |
|
Yes |
"Nt Surp" |
Yes |
Yes |
ES |
A |
DA |
7WTC |
A |
A |
|
"Nt
Surp" - Not surprised
## " Kenny Scott for Councilmember Philip Reed" |
|
(Councilmember
James Gennaro) |
|
No |
X |
No |
Yes |
C |
A |
DA |
DK |
A |
A |
Ø
RESULTS OF THE NEW YORK
LEGISLATOR SURVEY
Question 1:
Of the 16 legislators responding to the survey, only three said they had been
previously aware of the Zogby poll results: Assemblywoman Annette Mitchell
Robinson and City Council members C. Hiram Monserrate and Philip Reed.
Question 2:
Of those who expressed an initial reaction to the results of the Zogby poll,
both Congressman Jerrold Nadler and City Council member Philip Reed said they
were "not surprised" at the results. State Senator John L. Sampson
found the Zogby poll "interesting." Assemblywoman Annette Mitchell
Robinson expressed "shock" as her initial reaction to the Zogby poll
results, and State Senator Ada L. Smith's found the results
"troubling." Assemblyman Carl E. Heastie responded to the results with
a "concern for thorough investigation." In their responses, City
Council members C. Letitia James, Margarita Lopez and C. Hiram Monserratte all
seemed to welcome the conducting of the Zogby poll as a positive development.
Question 3:
Of the 16 respondents, only two, Assemblywoman A.M. Robinson and City Council
Member Philip Reed, said they had been previously aware that more than half of
the 380-plus questions remained unanswered of those posed to the Kean Commission
and its witnesses by the Family Steering Committee for the Independent 9/11
Commission (see, Appendix 4).
Question 4:
15 out of the 16 respondents said they would support a call for reopening the
9/11 investigations. Only Assemblyman Ivan Lafayette answered "NO" to
this question.
Question 5:
Of the 15 legislators who said they would support a call for a new 9/11
investigation, nine named the office of the New York State Attorney General
Eliott Spitzer as "the most effective venue today for getting to the truth
of 9/11." One respondent, Congressman Nadler, would prefer an investigation
in Congress, but only under Democratic control, and he otherwise chose the
Attorney General as the most effective venue. Four named Congress as the more
effective venue. Assemblyman Lafayette, who would not support reopening the 9/11
investigation, also said he would prefer Congress as the venue for such an
investigation. Alone among the respondents, State Senator Toby Ann Stavisky
suggested a new "non-partisan independent investigation" as the best
venue.
Legislator responses to the Zogby poll questions:
Question 6A:
14 of the 16 respondents agreed that officials "deliberately misled the
public about the threat Iraq posed to America." Two said they did not know.
Question 6B:
Four of the 16 legislators agreed that the 9/11 Commission "had answered
all the important questions about what actually happened on September 11."
A full 10 disagreed, and two said they did not know. It is interesting to note
that three of the four who agree that the 9/11 Commission answered all of the
important questions nevertheless still support their constituents in calling for
a new 9/11 investigation.
Question 6C:
Five out of 16 respondents were able to name 7 WTC as the third skyscraper to
collapse at the World Trade Center site on September 11. The rest did not
answer, did not know, or guessed wrong.
Question 6D:
Five out of 16 agreed with the statement that some U.S. leaders "knew in
advance that attacks were planned" and "consciously failed to take
action." Seven did not agree with this statement. Four said they did not
know.
Question 6E:
In keeping with their answers to Question 4, 15 out of the 16 legislators who
responded to the survey agreed that a new 9/11 investigation should be opened to
examine the still-unanswered questions of the Family Steering Committee.
Assemblyman Lafayette once again was the lone dissenter, answering that he did
not know.
Ø
The legislators survey and report were conducted under the supervision of
Promilla Dixit
Co-Producer Aint That Good News
WBAI 99.5 FM NY, Pacifica Radio
Special thanks to NY
9/11 Truth and all the volunteers who helped with the survey.
Ø
( Forward
to Appendix 4.)
On
November 19, 2004, the "Justice for 9/11" Steering Committee
submitted a Citizens' Complaint and Petition to the offices of the
Attorney General of New York State, Eliot Spitzer, citing probable cause
for an independent grand jury investigation to examine unsolved crimes
committed in connection with the events of September 11, 2001. We
are publishing the complete Complaint and Petition
online in this space as a living, growing document.
Nine members of September 11 families, Ground Zero first responders, and
citizens of New York have signed
on as the first complainants. We call on citizens to support this
action, to initiate similar actions in other states, and to sign the
online petition of solidarity.
|
Campaign
Contact
To discuss joining the coalition, filing support briefs and initiating actions in other
states and jurisdictions, please
contact:
David Kubiak
Exec. Director
911Truth.org
david@911truth.org |
Media
Contact
Kyle Hence
9/11 CitizensWatch
Tel. (212) 243-7787
or (401) 935-7715 kylehence@earthlink.net
Donations
Please donate to one of the sponsoring groups in the "Justice for
9/11" Steering Committee. |
Copyright (c) 2004 The "Justice for 9/11" Steering
Committee.
Materials that may be under other copyrights are used here
under fair-use provisions for non-commercial information purposes only.
|